Content Validity, costruct validity, and Creterion Validity meaning?
1. Content Validity, costruct validity, and Creterion Validity meaning?
Answer:
Content Validity - is the extent to which items are relevant to the content being measured.Construct validity - is the extent to which a tool measures an underlying construct.Criterion validity - is the extent to which the measures how well one measure predicts an outcome for another measure.Explanation:
2. Valid evidence should originate from a valid source.Judge weather the following are VALID or NOT VALID sources of information.
1valid 2valid 3not valid 4not valid5 not valid 6 valid 7 valid
Explanation:
sorry n lang kung mali kung nagrereklamo kau n magsagot
Answer:
Valid valid not validnot valid valid validnot validnot valid valid validExplanation:
sana maka tulong
3. Valid and not valid sentence
Answer:
Valid: an argument is valid if and only if it is necessary that if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true; if all the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true; it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false. Invalid: an argument that is not valid.
4. Operationalize the five ways of establishing validity in measurement by giving each two (2) exampleWays of Establishing Validity 1. Face Validity 2. Content Validity3. Predictive Validity4. Construct Validity5. Convergent Validityexample1.2.3.4.5.
Validity tells you how accurately a method measures something. The types of validity mentioned are construct, content, face, criterion, convergent, and prediction validity that will be elaborated below.
Construct validity
Example:
We cannot directly measure "depression" as an objective, observable thing. However, based on current psychology theory and research, we are able to quantify depression using a range of signs and symptoms, such as low energy and self-confidence.
Content validity
Example:
An end-of-semester algebra test is created by a math instructor for her class. Every type of algebra that was covered in class should be covered on the test. If particular forms of algebra are omitted, the findings could not be a reliable reflection of how well pupils comprehend the material. Likewise, if she adds questions that have nothing to do with algebra, the findings are no longer a reliable indicator of algebra proficiency.
Face validity
Example:
You design a poll to gauge how regularly people practice their eating habits. You look over the survey items, which include inquiries regarding each day's meals as well as any between-meal snacks. The survey appears to be a good depiction of what you want to test on the surface, therefore you value its high face validity.
Criterion validity
Example:
A university professor develops a brand-new exam to gauge candidates' proficiency in English writing. She locates an existing test that is thought to be a valid measurement of English writing ability and analyzes the results when the same set of students take both tests in order to determine how effectively the test actually measures students' writing skill. The new test has high criterion validity when the results are strikingly comparable.
Convergent validity
Example:
Use both participant observation and a survey as measurements. It is clear that they are measuring the same construct if the results of your two measurements are comparable (i.e., they converge).
Predictive validity
Example:
If people who score highly on an honesty test later demonstrate their honesty by their conduct, the exam has predictive validity.
Learn more about observation here https://brainly.ph/question/9602790
#SPJ1
5. 'If it rain, then there is thunder.' Is it valid or not? Explain why is it valid or not.
Answer:Not valid
Step-by-step explanation:because when it rains it doesn't mean there is a thunder
6. C Activity 2: Gear up Instructions: Complete the chart below by writing the “Source" into “Valid” or “Not Valid” column Valid Not Valid
Answer:
Valid po
Explanation:
pa brainliest po lodi
7. does information in music is valid or not valid? Why or why not?
Answer:
valid, because is necessary that if all of the premises are true.
hope it,s help
pa brainlest Po
8. valid or not valid the sum of two even number is odd. provide an example to validate your answer
Not valid
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of two even numbers is always even
9. 10. What is the type of validity when an instrument produces results similar to those ofanother instrument that will be employed in the future?A. Predictive ValidityC. Content ValidityB. Criterion ValidityD. Face Validity
A. Predictive Validity
THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITYThe degree to which test scores accurately predict scores on a criterion measure is its predictive validity. The extent to which college admissions test scores predict college grade point average is a striking example (GPA).
The predictive validity of an assessment is established by measuring the correlation coefficient between the assessment findings and the subsequent behavior of interest. The stronger the correlation between the assessment data and the target behavior, the higher the degree of predictive validity the assessment possesses.
In the context of pre-employment testing, predictive validity relates to how likely it is for test scores to predict the future performance of the company. Predictive validity is one type of validity evidence, which is a method for confirming a test's correlation with concrete outcomes.
Predictive validity in psychometrics is the degree to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on a criterion measure. The validity of a cognitive test for job performance, for instance, is determined by the correlation between test scores and, for instance, supervisor performance ratings.
Predictive validity is illustrated when a test can anticipate a future outcome. To establish this type of validity, the test must correlate with a variable that can only be evaluated in the future, for example, after administration.
Learn more about Predictive Validity here:
https://brainly.ph/question/24957388
#SPJ6
10. identify whether the following sources are valid or not valid
I Think Your QUESTION Is INCOMPLETE But I Suggest My Answer Below :)
Answer:1. Not valid
2. Valid
3. Valid
4. Not valid
5. Valid
6. Valid
7. Valid
8. Not valid
9-10. Valid
Explanation:You may understand valid to mean acceptable or reasonable, but it has a slightly different meaning within social media slang terms. According to Urban Dictionary, valid also means something that is very good or of a really high standard.
Mark This Answer Into BRAINLIEST ^_^Thanks!Answer:
Valid or invalid source
1 not valid
2 valid
3 valid
4 not valid
5 valid
6 valid
7 valid
8 not valid
9-10 valid
11. identify whether the following sources VALID or NOT VALID
Valid or invalid source
1 not valid
2 valid
3 valid
4 not valid
5 valid
6 valid
7 valid
8 not valid
9-10 valid
What is valid?The term "valid" comes from the Latin phrase Validus, which means "strong." The diploma to which a dimension device measures what it claims to be a degree determines its validity.(of an argument or point) having a valid foundation in common sense or fact; affordable or cogent.Validity refers to how well-based a concept, conclusion, or dimension is and the way intently it resembles the actual world.In general, a good or reliable supply is one which specialists to your subject sense are suitable in your needs. Because this varies, it is ideal to select the supply evaluation technique that satisfactorily meets your needs.To be deemed legitimate and reputable, an e-book writer has to cite studies or different sources.Purpose of valid sourcesIt's important to evaluate sources seriously when you consider that using credible/dependable sources makes you a higher writer. Consider untrustworthy sources to be contaminants in your reputation; in case you use them in your work, your work might also additionally lose credibility as a result.
How can you tell if the source of an information is credible?https://brainly.ph/question/3686825
What is an invalid source?This has come about to me whilst a quotation has been copied from any other record instead of being right away covered into the contemporary record - mainly if it is in a footnote. The difficulty might then stand up due to the fact the referenced record changed into now no longer covered inside the contemporary record's reference list.Because it's far primarily based totally on a blunder, an invalid argument or end is incorrect. The actual facts, in our opinion, render the arguments of the one untenable.The term invalid refers to something that isn't always correct, provable, or legally recognized.Reliable and unreliable sources of health information and productshttps://brainly.ph/question/334068
Did you believe these news items were true?how did you know they wer true/falsehttps://brainly.ph/question/3639065
#BRAINLYEVERYDAY
12. 1. Differentiate the types of validity (Content validity, Construct Validity and Criterion-related Validity) 2. Compare structured and unstructured questionnaire.
Answer:
1. Validity is the extent to which a measure or assessment tool accurately measures what it intends to measure. There are three types of validity:
- Content validity: This refers to the degree to which a measurement tool represents all aspects of the construct being measured. It evaluates the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the items included in the measure. Content validity is often established through expert judgment, and the items are usually based on a careful review of the literature or consultation with subject matter experts.
- Construct validity: This refers to the degree to which a measurement tool accurately measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. It involves demonstrating that the measure correlates with other measures or outcomes in a manner consistent with theoretical predictions. This type of validity is usually established through factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.
- Criterion-related validity: This refers to the degree to which a measurement tool accurately predicts or correlates with a criterion measure. It involves establishing a correlation between the measure being tested and a criterion measure that is already known to be valid. Criterion-related validity can be established through concurrent validity, which involves comparing the results of the measure being tested with the criterion measure at the same time, or through predictive validity, which involves comparing the results of the measure being tested with the criterion measure at a future point in time.
2. A questionnaire is a research instrument used to collect data from participants in a standardized and structured way. Questionnaires can be structured or unstructured:
- Structured questionnaire: This type of questionnaire has a fixed set of questions with predetermined response options, which are usually closed-ended questions (yes/no, multiple choice, rating scales, etc.). Structured questionnaires are easier to analyze and compare across participants, and they provide more reliable and objective data.
- Unstructured questionnaire: This type of questionnaire is more flexible and open-ended, allowing participants to respond in their own words without predetermined response options. Unstructured questionnaires are often used in qualitative research to explore participants' experiences, perceptions, and attitudes in more depth. They are more subjective and difficult to analyze, but they provide richer and more detailed data.
your welcome po
13. 1. What kind of validity would you use if your research instruments is a researcher's-made test? a. Face Validity b. Content Validity C. Construct Validity d. No need for a validation
Answer:
1. Content validity
Explanation:
(Carry On Learning)
14. does information in editorial is valid or not valid? Why or why not?
Answer:
Editorials have:
1. Introduction, body and conclusion like other news stories
2. An objective explanation of the issue, especially complex issues
3. A timely news angle
4. Opinions from the opposing viewpoint that refute directly the same issues the writer addresses
5. The opinions of the writer delivered in a professional manner. Good editorials engage issues, not personalities and refrain from name-calling or other petty tactics of persuasion.
6. Alternative solutions to the problem or issue being criticized. Anyone can gripe about a problem, but a good editorial should take a pro-active approach to making the situation better by using constructive criticism and giving solutions.
7. A solid and concise conclusion that powerfully summarizes the writer's opinion. Give it some punch.
Explanation:
it's valid
pili n lng po kayu Jan
lhat po Yan ay naka connect sa valid information in editorial
Explanation:
2 po tama po yan dahil ganyan din ang modyul ko
15. Differentiate internal validity from external validity
Answer:
Internal validity refers to the degree of confidence that the causal relationship being tested is trustworthy and not influenced by other factors or variables. External validity refers to the extent to which results from a study can be applied (generalized) to other situations, groups or events.
Explanation:
;)
16. validity technique of criterion concurrent validity
Answer:
Concurrent validity is demonstrated when a test correlates well with a measure that has previously been validated. ... The two measures in the study are taken at the same time. This is in contrast to predictive validity, where one measure occurs earlier and is meant to predict some later measure.
17. what is validation/validity to you? and why it's important?
Answer:
Validity is important because it determines what survey questions to use, and helps ensure that researchers are using questions that truly measure the issues of importance. The validity of a survey is considered to be the degree to which it measures what it claims to measure.
Explanation:
pa brainliest po salamat
18. nya ichi ni san nya arigato1. valid2. valid3. not valid4. valid5. validsalamat sa mga televiewers shout out sa isa kamukha ni juwaw
xiexiexiexiexiexieziexie
19. ano po ang meaning ng valid at not valid?
Answer:
When a term for validity is applied to an assumption or argument, "invalid" seems to be reserved for incorrect ones a reasonable person might mistakenly make, while "non-valid", if it was used in that context, would cover cases more not valid.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
20. Give the Valid Arguments 1. 2.3.4give the valid arguments
Answer:
please complete you're questions21. how can you datermine if the evidence is valid or not valid?
Answer:
1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source. ...
2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution. ...
3) Currency. ...
4) Coverage.
Explanation:
goggle source,correct me if im wrong gusto ko lang namang tumulong.
Answer:
There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not.
1) Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source. Look also for disclaimers as to the accuracy of the content. You may also want to double-check the information against a source that you already know is trustworthy. Even though a source may use technical language, the content may be misleading.
2) Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution. If you are using a webpage, you can usually identify the owner/publisher by the URL, or check for a copyright statement near the bottom of the page. Make sure the author has the proper credentials on the subject matter. Also, determine if the source is biased. For example, if it is medical information from a drug company, that company will provide information in support of its product. Be aware of the objectivity of the author and his/her viewpoints.
3) Currency. Depending on your subject, your currency needs will vary. For topics related to recent breakthroughs in medicine and technology, you will need to find up-to-date sources. If, however, you are researching a historical topic, older resources may still be useful. For webpages, you can often find a copyright date near the bottom. Also, look for the words "revised" or "updated" to find the date of the website.
4) Coverage. You will also want to examine the content of the source and how it fits your information needs. Identify its relevancy to your topic and whether or not it addresses the subject matter. Also, make sure it provides enough information if you are looking for a source that discusses the matter in-depth. Additionally, determine if the site provides all the data you may need. For example, if you need to include graphs or charts in your paper, try to find a source that provides these.
To summarize, check who published the source, the purpose of the source, when it was created/updated, and its content. Also see if it has any potential bias and, if a webpage, provides references or reliable links to other sources.
22. A researcher used a diagnosis by a psychiatrist to validate a 10-item measure of depression. What type of validity is being assessed? a) Criterion validity b) Face validity c) Construct validity d) Content validity
B is the answer for it
Thank u
23. hiw the validity validity was established? research
My own answer and explanation also:Validity is the extent to which the scores actually represent the variable they are intended to. Validity is a judgment based on various types of evidence. ... The reliability and validity of a measure is not established by any single study but by the pattern of results across multiple studies.
24. 3. It is the extent to which a research instrument accurately measures what it intends to measure.A. Construct validityB. Content validityC. Criterion validityD. Face validity
Answer:
A. Construct validity
Explanation:
In research, there are three ways to approach validity and they include content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity.25. 1.Of the types of validity tests, what is concerned with the relation of test scores to performance of some future time, e.g. Freshmen college test can show success in college? *a.Curriculum validityb.Criterion validityc.Content validityd.Predictive validity
Answer:
d.predictive validity
Explanation:
yan yung tamang sagot
26. valid test always valid
Answer:
Hi po thanks sa points hehe
27. Can the validity of a model be limited, or must it be universally valid? How does this compare to the required validity of a theory or a law?
Answer:
The validity of every model is limited. Models are approximations we use when reality is either too complex or too messy to handle directly.
“Laws” and “theories” are synonyms for “models.” “Law” is now pretty much archaic, and “theory” is heading that way.
28. valid and not valid sentence
Answer:
Example of valid sentence
Her objections were completely valid.
Example of invalid sentence
You treat me like an invalid or a child.
Explanation:
hope this helps
29. The higher an item-validity index, the greater the __________ validity
What is an item validity index? a statistic designed to provide an indication of the degree to which a test is measuring what it purports to measure. The higher the item-validity index, the greater the test's criterion-related validity
#PA BRAINLIST PO
EXPLAIN: it’s my opinion/answer
30. A type of validity where in an instrument that is judged with content validity meets the objectives of the study. A. Content Validity B. Face Validity C. Construct Validity D. Predicitve Validity pa help pls, para sa kapatid ko. salamat po in advance
Answer:
B. Face validity-considers how suitable the content of a test seems to be on the surface. It’s similar to content validity, but face validity is a more informal and subjective assessment.
Explanation: